Method and Approach
Much of my work deals with the theme of religion and power. I am interested in the way in which religions relate to unequal distributions of power. I view religion as a basically conservative force which provides stabile niches of meaningful identity and legitimation of existing social formations. In certain circumstances, however, religion can mobilise change and influence redistributions of power.
My work is also concerned with the theme of religion, values and emotions. I argue that religions offer ‘alternate orderings’ and ‘ideal worlds’, and give access to that which transcends the everyday by virtue its greater truth, beauty, goodness, power, and value. As such, they offer emotionally-compelling value orientations, which can illuminate the rest of life. However, they have to negotiate with competing value orientations, including those characteristic of the different spheres of ‘secular’ modern societies. I consider their growth, decline and transformation of religions within this framework.
My approach is influenced by Marx and feminist theory, as well as by many anthropologists and sociologists of religion past and present, including Durkheim and Simmel.
I was originally trained in theology and religious studies, and I retain an interest in the historical and cultural dimensions of religion. My main interest, however, is in religion as a social force. I like to undertake empirical research whenever possible.
I am most experienced in participant observation and interviewing. I’m interested in the potential of action research and focus groups for exploring social relations. I have some experience with representative sampling and survey design.
I have a fairly pragmatic approach to selecting the best methods for any particular project. I’ve been influenced by recent work on mixed methods research which offers useful guidelines for the selection and combination of various qualitative and/or quantitative methods in relation to particular research needs.